By Michael Rubin
Former FBI agent Robert Levinson just passed his 3,000th day in Iranian prison[s].
Monday, on Memorial Day, retired U.S. Marine Amir Hekmati spent his 1,367th day in an Iranian prison. He was picked up by security in Tehran while visiting his grandmother. His visit was not careless; he had secured permission from the Iranian Interest Section in Washington, D.C., before making his trip.
The fourth hostage is Saeed Abedini, an Iranian-American pastor from Idaho whom Iranian authorities arrested in 2012 while he, too, was visiting family.
“Jason Rezaian is a canary in the coal mine. Negotiating with Rouhani over the fate of the Iranian nuclear program is like striking a deal with a night watchman to buy the Empire State Building.”
Actions speak louder than words. President Obama and Secretary of State John Kerry have predicated outreach to Iran on the idea that rapprochement will strength the hand of the moderates against Iran’s implacable ideologues. In a sense, the White House believes they have found a Deng Xiaoping moment in which support for pragmatists can marginalize hardliners permanently and enhance security and cooperation between former adversaries.
Their logic is wrong on three counts. First, Iranian President Hassan Rouhani is no moderate. He was always the Iranian regime’s trusted “Mr. Fix-it.” As nuclear negotiator between 2003 and 2005, he bragged about deceiving the West. Defending his feigned moderation to the West, he outlined a doctrine of surprise: Lull America into complacency with talk, and then deliver a knock-out blow.
During the 2013 election campaign (in which Iranian authorities allowed only one percent of the candidates to actually run), Rouhani’s campaign commercials highlighted how he was the first person in the Islamic Republic to bestow the honorific “Imam,” in context suggesting Messianic overtones, to revolutionary leader Ayatollah Khomeini.
Finally, the record matters. Rouhani purged Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps (IRGC) veterans from the cabinet, but replaced them with Intelligence Ministry veterans. Rouhani is as much a reform Iranian politicians as Vladimir Putin is a reform Russian politician.
Second, even if a deal bolsters Rouhani’s popularity, he remains marginal on questions relating to Iranian nuclear policy today. In the Islamic Republic, the president is about style, the Supreme Leader about substance. When Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei spoke about “heroic flexibility,” he did not endorse a nuclear deal, but rather a change in tactics.
The military aspects of Iran’s nuclear program are wholly in the hands of the IRGC, a group responsible for the deaths of hundreds of Americans in both Iraq and Afghanistan, and a string of terrorist attacks stretching from Buenos Aires to Beirut to Bangkok. Notably, the IRGC has refused to endorse or abide by any agreement reached in the current process.
Furthermore, while acting State Department spokesman Marie Harf has suggested money might moderate Iran, she ignores the stranglehold that the IRGC has over Iran’s oil industry, construction, and import-export. Delivering $100 billion to Iran will simply make the IRGC the world’s richest terrorist group by several orders of magnitude.
Indeed, Obama’s strategy has been tried before. Between 2000 and 2005, a period when so-called reformists still ran Iran, European Union trade with Iran more than doubled. So too did the price of oil. Iran reaped a hard currency windfall. The result? A hugely enhanced nuclear and ballistic missile program.
And, third, the China model may not be all that it’s cracked up to be. China never joined the West or embraced global peace and tolerance, but rather used its new found wealth to build a first world military and bully not only its neighbors but also the United States. Enriching and empowering enemies never works unless, of course, the goal is to lessen the relative power and position of the United States. Does Obama really want a new China?
Back to Jason Rezaian. He is a canary in the coal mine. Negotiating with Rouhani over the fate of the Iranian nuclear program is like striking a deal with a night watchman to buy the Empire State Building.
The Obama administration may like to believe that Rouhani has the desire and power to bring Iran’s hardliners into check but if he can’t stop revolutionary authorities from seizing and trying Americans in kangaroo courts (or just holding them incommunicado as in the case of Levinson), then how can anyone imagine that Rouhani can bring them into line with regard to nuclear policy?
Perhaps Iranian officials once thought they could trade hostages for concessions, as they did under Presidents Jimmy Carter and Ronald Reagan. They never expected a White House so disinterested in winning the freedom of its citizens, however.
Perhaps then, as with the Islamic State (ISIS, ISIL, Daesh), the goal of seizing, torturing, and perhaps even executing Rezaian is to humiliate the United States.
Once, Iranian authorities sought to humiliate symbolically the United States by forcing pedestrians to march over depictions of the American flag. The treatment of Rezaian against the backdrop of American impotence simply raises the symbolism to a new level.
Iran’s ideology hasn’t changed and it won’t, so long as the Supreme Leader remains and the Islamic Revolution persists. The only change that will come will be the names of its victims. Unfortunately, Mr. Rezaian will not be the last.
Michael Rubin is a Resident Scholar at the American Enterprise Institute and author of Dancing with the Devil (Encounter, 2015), a history of American diplomacy with rogue regimes.
[Photos and emphases above were added]
The Obama Administration’s simple acknowledgements of the plight of 4 American hostages’ in Iran is not enough! It will not bring them home. They have been wrongly held now in unimaginably dire conditions. GITMO prisoners as I say often have it far better! This issue will not be resolved unless the President of the United States and his Secretary of State John Kerry make some hard-nosed forceful demands. That’s what the ME region respects…not “Shake my hand, please?” Without a new approach, these 4 Americans will continue to languish in dangerous Iranian prisons.
We are pleased by the increased attention that the 4 American hostages have been getting in recent months, on social media platforms like Twitter and Facebook as well as TV, radio and print news interviews with the 4 families and elected officials in Washington, DC. This ‘media surge ‘must be maintained until the Obama Administration acts to obtain the releases of all 4 men and they are returned to their families.
Please continue to support these men – stay informed – pray as you are led – get involved! Each man has a unique ‘story’ that is posted elsewhere on this website. There are many interesting facts about the men and links to their families’ Facebook and Twitter accounts. The four are at risk of further declining health and cannot, should not, be held against their will another month, much less another year in Iran!
FreeAllThree.com adds its voice to encourage Americans to call, write, text, email, tweet or visit their Congressman and Senators to: Demand that the Obama Administration take more urgent steps immediately to ‘Free All 4 Americans’ who are held hostages and pawns in Iran today!
If you don’t know your Congressional representatives’ names and contact info: an easy-to-use ‘interactive map’ is on the ALCJ.org website. Or follow this link for How to Get Involved with ideas you can use: http://wp.me/P49SUn-oY
Thanks for your concern regarding the 4 Americans held hostage in Iran and their families. News about U.S. and Iranian relations and other related middle-east developments are also posted on this website on a regular basis.
NO MORE SANCTIONS RELIEF FOR IRAN UNTIL THEY FREE ALL 4 AMERICANS!
Please share this page via Twitter or Facebook if you ‘Like.’ Thanks.
Email corrections/comments to: Daniel @ FreeAllThree . com (Website URL is www.freeallthree.com)